1. Municipal Rule on National Health Insurance Reimbursement: amended by ordinance of the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. No. 140 2009;11. 30.
2. New Health Technologies Decision and Adjustment Standard Act: amended by act of the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. No. 2009-3 2009;08. 24.
3. Lee SH, Sul AR, Jung YJ. Australian Health Technology Assessment Agency meeting report 2011;Seoul: National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaboratory Agency.
4. Municipal Rule on New Health Technology Municipal: partially amended by the ordinance of the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. No. 1 2009;03. 03.
5. Lee SH. In: Lee SH, editor. New health technology assessment. Function and role of Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service 2009;Seoul: Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. 495-507.
6. University of York. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD's guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews 2001;2nd ed. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York.
7. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. Report of heath technology assessment demonstration agency operating 2005;Seoul: Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. 378.
8. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors 2004;Seoul: Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service.
9. Bidwell S, Jensen MF. In: Topfer LA, Auston I, editor. National Information Center on Health Services Research & Health Care Technology (US). Using a search protocol to identify sources of information: the COSI model. Etext on health technology assessment (HTA) information resources 2004;Bethesda: US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Health & Human Services.
10. Notes on the use of methodology checklist 1: systematic reviews and meta-analyses [Internet]. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network c2001-2011;cited 2012 Feb 27. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Available from:
http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/50/notes1.html
11. Dawes M, Davies P, Gray A, Mant J, Seers K, Snowball R. Evidence-based practice: a primer for health care professionals 2005;2nd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier. 277.
13. Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G. Royal Society of Medicine (Great Britain). Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine: how to review and apply findings of healthcare research 2011;2nd ed. London: Royal Society of Medicine. 201.
14. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [Internet] 2011;Cambridge: The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from:
http://www.cochrane-handbook.org
15. Guyatt G, Rennie D. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. American Medical Association. User's guides to the medical literature 2005;Chicago: AMA Press. 706.
16. Lee SH, Jang SY, Jung JH. HER-2 gene silver in situ hybridization in gastric adenocarinoma 2011;Seoul: Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. 67.
17. Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews in health care: systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. BMJ 2001;323:157-162.
18. Greenhalgh T. Papers that summarise other papers: systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMJ 1997;315:672-675.
19. Chalmers I, Altman DG. Systematic reviews 1995;London: BMJ Publishing.
20. National Health and Medical Research Council. How to review the evidence: systematic identification and review of the scientific literature 2000;Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council.