1. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Notification no. 2012-62 of the Ministry of Health and Welfare: amendment of health insurance reimbursement, non-reimbursement list of medical procedures and relative value of reimbursement [Internet] Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2012;cited 2015 Dec 4. Available from:
http://www.mohw.go.kr/front_new/al/sal0301ls.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403
4. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Guidelines for new DRG pilot project [Internet] Seoul: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. 2016;cited 2016 Oct 27. Available from:
http://biz.hira.or.kr/index.jsp
5. Kim Y. Towards universal coverage: an evaluation of the benefit enhancement plan for four major conditions in Korean National Health Insurance. J Korean Med Assoc 2014;57:198-203.
6. Ji YG. The reform of health insurance policy. J Korean Med Assoc 2012;55:978-986.
7. Choi J. Perspectives on cost containment and quality of health care in the DRG payment system of Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 2012;55:706-709.
9. Quentin W, Scheller-Kreinsen D, Blumel M, Geissler A, Busse R. Hospital payment based on diagnosis-related groups differs in Europe and holds lessons for the United States. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:713-723.
10. Busse R, Geissler A, Quentin W. World Health Organization. Diagnosis-related groups in Europe: moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2011.
11. Martelli N, van den Brink H. Special funding schemes for innovative medical devices in French hospitals: the pros and cons of two different approaches. Health Policy 2014;117:1-5.
12. Cavalieri M, Gitto L, Guccio C. Reimbursement systems and quality of hospital care: an empirical analysis for Italy. Health Policy 2013;111:273-289.
15. Sorenson C, Drummond M, Burns LR. Evolving reimbursement and pricing policies for devices in Europe and the United States should encourage greater value. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:788-796.
16. Hutton J, Trueman P, Henshall C. Coverage with evidence development: an examination of conceptual and policy issues. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007;23:425-432.
17. Scheller-Kreinsen D, Quentin W, Busse R. DRG-based hospital payment systems and technological innovation in 12 European countries. Value Health 2011;14:1166-1172.
20. Kim JM. 1 Years after beginning of DRG services system. J Korean Med Assoc 2013;56:942-944.
23. Elhao M, Abdallah K, Serag I, El-Laithy M, Agur W. Efficacy of using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in patients with different degrees of operative difficulty: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;147:86-90.
24. Health Insurance Assessment and Review Service. Advisory conference for the gynecology DRG group [Internet] Seoul: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. 2011;cited 2015 Nov 27. Available from:
http://ksog.org/bbs/?code=po
26. Min EG. Obstetrics and gynecology's strategies for DRG [Internet] Seoul: Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012;cited 2015 Nov 23. Available from:
http://www.ksog.org/journal/search.php
29. Schreyogg J, Baumler M, Busse R. Balancing adoption and affordability of medical devices in Europe. Health Policy 2009;92:218-224.
31. Busse R, Schreyogg J, Smith PC. Variability in healthcare treatment costs amongst nine EU countries: results from the HealthBASKET project. Health Econ 2008;17:1 Suppl. S1-S8.