A Review of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment

Article information

J Korean Med Assoc. 2009;52(6):567-572
Publication date (electronic) : 2009 June 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2009.52.6.567
1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Korea. don@hallym.or.kr
2Department of Neurosurgery, Gachon Medical Science University, Korea. samddal@gachon.ac.kr

Abstract

The American Medical Association's Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (Guides) has provided an useful guideline in interpreting information on permanent impairment based on the in-depth knowledge and experience in impairment ratings accumulated for a long period of time. Since its first publication by American Medical Association (1958), as 'A Guide to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment of the Extremities and Back', 12 additional 'guides' has been published by the JAMA over the next 12 years. All the guides were consolidated to become the first official edition of the 'Guides' in 1971. The 'Guides' has been updated periodically to reflect current scientific clinical knowledge and judgment methods. It has become the best system available to evaluate permanent impairments across many disciplines. The latest sixth edition created a "paradigm shift" in the area of the impairment assessment by introducing a contemporary model of disablement. The standardized methods elaborated in the sixth edition clearly enhances the relevancy of impairment ratings, improves internal consistency of the methods and renders the application of the rating process easier. It adopts the terminology and conceptual framework from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in order to generate five impairment classes. A diagnosis-based grid has been developed for each organ system. Functional history, physical findings and objective clinical test results are integrated to determine the grade within the impairment class. The 'Guides' is the most widely used source for assessing and rating permanent impairments in the United States and can be considered as the best available method for the assessment of permanent impairment.

References

1. American Medical Association. Guides to the Evaluation Of Permanent Impairment 1971. Chicago: American Medical Association;
2. McBride ED. Disability evaluation and principles of treatment of compensable injuries 1963. 6th edth ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott;
3. American Medical Association. Guides to the Evaluation Of Permanent Impairment 1984. 2nd edth ed. Chicago: American Medical Association;
4. American Medical Association. Guides to the Evaluation Of Permanent Impairment 1988. 3rd edth ed. Chicago: American Medical Association;
5. American Medical Association. Guides to the Evaluation Of Permanent Impairment 1993. 4th edth ed. Chicago: American Medical Association;
6. American Medical Association. Guides to the Evaluation Of Permanent Impairment 2001. 5th edth ed. Chicago: AMA Press;
7. Lee KS. Impairment evaluation and independent medical examination 2002. 1st edth ed. Seoul: Jungang Munha Press; 77–109.
8. Rhim KS. The Basics of compensation medicine 2004. 5th edth ed. Seoul: Jungang Munha Press; 60–85.
9. Rondinelli RD, Katz RT. Merits and shortcomings of the American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 5th ed. A physiatric perspective. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2002. 13355–370.
10. Spieler EA, Barth PS, Burton JF Jr, Himmelstein J, Rudolph L. Recommendations to guide revision of the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. American Medical Association. JAMA 2000. 283519–523.
11. American Medical Association. Guides to the Evaluation Of Permanent Impairment 2007. 6th edth ed. Chicago: American Medical Association;

Article information Continued

Table 1

Generic template for impairment classification grids

Table 1