The role of the Korean Hospital Association in Korea's healthcare accreditation system

Article information

J Korean Med Assoc. 2012;55(1):23-30
Publication date (electronic) : 2012 January 11
doi : https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.1.23
1Hallym University Medical Center, Anyang, Korea.
2Evaluation and Training Committee of Korean Hospital Association, Anyang, Korea.
Corresponding author: Hae-Ran Lee, drran@hallym.or.kr
Received 2011 November 10; Accepted 2011 November 20.

Abstract

One way to improve quality and safety in healthcare organizations is through accreditation. The Hospital Standardization Programme (HSP) started by the Korean Hospital Association (KHA) in 1981 was the first hospital accreditation body in Korea. The KHA developed the HSP into the Hospital Accreditation Programme (HAP) in 2003, which was designed to evaluate the quality of physicians' training, hospital facilities, and systems. In 2004, the Association adopted a Pass/Fail system by medical department. The introduction of the HAP has a significant meaning in the history of Korean healthcare policy. First, through self-regulating assessment, the HAP plays a major role not only in improving Korean healthcare services but also in establishing mutual confidence between healthcare providers and customers. Secondly, the HAP became the starting point of the quality assurance movement in hospital services, which transformed the mainstream of healthcare services from quantitative change to qualitative change. In response to customer demand, several healthcare evaluation programs such as the Hospital Performance Evaluation Programme (1995-1999), Healthcare Organization Evaluation Programme (2004-2009), and Korea Healthcare Accreditation System (2010-present) have been adopted. In implementing those healthcare evaluation systems, the KHA has played a critical role. Moreover, the KHA plans to revise the HAP Survey Forms, reducing areas overlapping with KHAS and enhancing the training programs to produce the best qualified medical specialists who will provide the best medical services to customers.

References

1. WJ Park. Guideline of quality improvement in healthcare services 2009. 2nd edth ed. Seoul: Korea Medical Book Publisher Co.; 414.
2. Global Hospital Facilitation Center. Quality improvement in healthcare service in the era of global healthcare 2010. Seoul: Korea Medical Book Publisher Co.; 422.
3. Korean Hospital Association. Korean Hospital Association 50 years 2010. Seoul: Kummyung Co.; 369.
4. Korea Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs. Seoul National University College of Medicine. A study on the long-term development of accreditation system of the healthcare organizations 2005. Seoul: Korea Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs;
5. Korea Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs. Yonsei University Medical College. A study on the introduction of hospital accreditation system 2008. Seoul: Korea Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs;
6. Korea Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs. Korea Health Industry Development Institute. Policy forum on 'A search for method of introduction of hospital accreditation' 2009. Seoul: Korea Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs;
7. Park JH. Understanding of the new Korea healthcare accreditation system. J Korean Med Assoc 2011. 54142–145.
8. Quality and accreditation in health care services: a global review [Internet]. World Health Organization 2000. cited 2011 Dec 16. Geneva: World Health Organization; Available from: http://www.who.int/hrh/documents/en/quality_accreditation.pdf.
9. Baudendistel TE, Schmaltz SP, Williams SC, Chassin MR, Loeb JM, Wachter RM. Hospital performance trends on national quality measures and the association with joint commission accreditation. J Hosp Med 2011. 6453.
10. Pomey MP, Lemieux-Charles L, Champagne F, Angus D, Shabah A, Contandriopoulos AP. Does accreditation stimulate change? A study of the impact of the accreditation process on Canadian healthcare organizations. Implement Sci 2010. 531.
11. Groene O, Lombarts MJ, Klazinga N, Alonso J, Thompson A, Sunol R. Is patient-centredness in European hospitals related to existing quality improvement strategies? Analysis of a cross-sectional survey (MARQuIS study). Qual Saf Health Care 2009. 18Suppl 1. i44–i50.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

The background and meaning of the hospital standardization programme (HSP). KHA, Korean Hospital Association.

Figure 2

Reinforcement of hospital standardization program (HSP). HA, hospital accreditation; KoSQUA, the Korean Society of Quality Assurance in Health Care.

Figure 3

Establishment of Hospital Accreditation Center. HAC, Hospital Accreditation Center; IT, information technology.

Table 1

Healthcare evaluation systems in Korea

Table 1

KHA, Korean Hospital Association; MW, Ministry of Health and Welfare; KHIDI, Korean Health Industry Development Institute; NEMC, National Emergency Medical Center; HIRA, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service; ICU, Intensive Care Unit.

Table 2

Examples of recent accreditation programmes

Table 2

From World Health Organization. Quality and accreditation in health care services: a global review. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000 [8].

JCI, Joint Commission Internationale; QAP, Quality Assurance Project, USA; PAHO, Pan American Health Organization; EFQM, European Foundation for Quality Management; USAID, United States Agency for International Development.

Table 3

Relationship of the accreditation organization to government

Table 3

From World Health Organization. Quality and accreditation in health care services: a global review. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000 [8].

CSB, Clninical Standards Boards for Scotland; ACHS, Australian Council on Healthcare Standards; QIC, Quality Improvement Council, Australia; AGPAL, Australian General Practice Accreditation Ltd.; HQS, Health Quality Service, UK; HAP, Hospital Accreditation Programme, UK; NCQA, National Committee for Quality Assurance, USA.