A qualitative study on leadership experiences of women doctors in Korea

Article information

J Korean Med Assoc. 2018;61(2):101-110
Publication date (electronic) : 2018 February 14
doi : https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2018.61.2.101
1Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
2Korean Medical Women's Association, Seoul, Korea.
3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.
4Department of Pathology, Rehabilitation Institute of Neuromuscular Disease, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
5Department of Family Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Corresponding author: Hyun-Young Shin. shy801117@gmail.com
Received 2018 January 02; Accepted 2018 January 17.

Abstract

This study was designed to explore women doctors' leadership experiences and to identify mechanisms of leadership development based on their experiences. Between November 1 and December 18, 2017, in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 women doctors whose professional roles included being the dean of a college of medicine, director of a university hospital system, director of a government institution, and member of the National Assembly. Twelve meaningful experiences were discovered, and 10 mechanisms and several action steps for developing women doctors' leadership were drawn from the interviews. Firstly, women doctors' leadership experiences can be divided into 4 periods: experiences before entering medical school, time during medical school, the training process, and experiences after completing board certification as a clinical specialist or PhD candidate. These periods were respectively designated as an unaffected leap, temporary break, involuntary interruption, and voluntary leap forward. Secondly, based on these results, 10 mechanisms for leadership development were identified. These included an intimate relationship with one's father, curiosity and concerns about various themes, accepting opportunities that arise, work-life balance from an individual perspective, promotion of social concerns regarding the under-representation of medical leaders, removal of traditional stereotypes about women doctors, remedies for invisible discrimination (glass ceiling) from a social perspective, as well as the provision of equal leadership experience and opportunities, the promotion of active mentoring, and the extension of formal and informal networks from an educational perspective. Currently, 25% of doctors are women, and they are not a token group any more. In order to resolve women's under-representation in medical leadership, practical and concrete efforts in individual, social, and educational domains, which are appropriate and adaptable to Korean culture, are needed.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Personal qualities demanded to doctor and Leader & requests to the junior women doctor

References

1. Korean Medical Association. Annual membership statistics Seoul: Korean Medical Association; 1980-2016.
2. Daehac.com. Women doctors 9 times increase: the number of female students of medical school were 669 last year [Internet] Gunpo: Daehac.com; 2016. cited 2018 Jan 22. Available from: http://www.daehac.com/html/common/_news_print.php?newsId=3482.
3. Wehner MR, Nead KT, Linos K, Linos E. Plenty of moustaches but not enough women: cross sectional study of medical leaders. BMJ 2015;351:h6311.
4. Kim SH. The status of female doctors in Korean health institutions. Health Soc Sci 2004;16:89–130.
5. Park MW. 25% of doctors, only 5% of medical leaderships. Medipana 2016. 05. 24. cited 2018 Jan 22. Available from: http://medipana.com/news/news_viewer.asp?NewsNum=182490.
6. Kanter RM. Some effects of proportions on group life: skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. Am J Sociol 1977;82:965–990.
7. Korean Medical Association. Asian Institute for Bioethics and Health Law. Current status of training conditions and suggestions to improve childbirth rate of female residents Seoul: Korean Medical Association; 2012.
8. DeAngelis CD, Johns ME. Promotion of women in academic medicine: shatter the ceilings, polish the floors. JAMA 1995;273:1056–1057.
9. Lampe A. Book reviews. Gender in the workplace: a case study approach. Gend Work Organ 2001;8:346–351.
10. Rees S. Women and senior leadership in medicine [Internet] London: NHS Leadership Academy; cited 2018 Jan 22. Available from: https://www.nwpgmd.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/Sian%20Rees.pdf.
11. Fried LP, Francomano CA, MacDonald SM, Wagner EM, Stokes EJ, Carbone KM, Bias WB, Newman MM, Stobo JD. Career development for women in academic medicine: multiple interventions in a department of medicine. JAMA 1996;276:898–905.
12. Kim YH. Woman, leader and woman leadership Seoul: Samsung Economic Research Institute; 2006.
13. Vinnicombe S. The Issues facing women in management in UK and around. Vocat Guid J 1998;3:192–197.

Article information Continued

Table 1

Characteristics of interviewees

Table 1

MWIA, Medical Women' International Association; SMA, Seoul Medical Association; KCDC, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; OBGYN, obstetrics and gynecology.