PDF Links
PubReader
XML Download
Full text via DOI
Download Citation
 |
 |
| J Korean Med Assoc > Volume 54(3); 2011 > Article |
Abstract
The evolution of total joint replacement is not merely of historical interest. We review the historic development of total joint arthroplasty to look at what has been selected and what has not selected in the past. For more than 30 years, total joint arthroplasty has been progressively developed to improve functional outcomes and survivorship. There has been debate regarding the presence of posterior cruciate ligament (cruciate retaining vs. posterior stabilized) and bearing articulation (fixed vs. mobile). Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is used through minimally invasive surgery with relatively good results. Still, liner wear and limitation in the range of motion were concerns, prompting the development of highly cross-linked polyethylene and hyperflexion design prostheses. Although there have been a number of improvements in the design and concepts behind hip joint arthroplasty for many years, fixation methods and bearing surfaces are still in debate. Future developments in total joint arthroplasty should be focused on improved function, wear reduction, enhanced kinematics, and increased range of motion. We can look forward to further advancements in total joint arthro-plasty in the area of new materials and designs.
References
1. Ferguson W. Excision of the knee joint: recovery with a false joint and a useful limb. Med Times Gaz 1861;1:601.
2. Campbell WC. Interposition of vitallium plates in arthroplasties of the knee: preliminary report. By Willis C. Campbell, 1940. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;226):3-5.
3. MacIntosh DL. Hemiarthroplasty of the knee using a space occupying prosthesis for painful varus and valgus deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958;40:1431.
4. Walldius B. Arthroplasty of the knee joint using an endoprosthesis. Acta Orthop Scand 1957;24:Suppl. 19.
5. Gunston FH. Polycentric knee arthroplasty: prosthetic simulation of normal knee movement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1971;53:272-277.
6. Coventry MB, Finerman GA, Riley LH, Turner RH, Upshaw JE. A new geometric knee for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1972;83:157-162.
7. Freeman MA, Swanson SA, Todd RC. Total replacement of the knee using the Freeman-Swanson knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1973;94):153-170.
8. Ranawat CS, Insall J, Shine J. Duo-condylar knee arthroplasty: hospital for special surgery design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976;120):76-82.
9. Townley CO. The anatomic total knee resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985;192):82-96.
10. Walker PS, Ranawat C, Insall J. Fixation of the tibial components of condylar replacement knee prostheses. J Biomech 1976;9:269-275.
11. Rand JA, Chao EY, Stauffer RN. Kinematic rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:489-497.
12. Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein AH. The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: a modification of the total condylar design. Two to four-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:1317-1323.
13. Martin SD, McManus JL, Scott RD, Thornhill TS. Press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. 5- to 9-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:603-614.
14. Freeman MA, Railton GT. Should the posterior cruciate ligament be retained or resected in condylar nonmeniscal knee arthro-plasty? The case for resection J Arthroplasty 1988;3:Suppl. S3-S12.
15. Goodfellow JW, O'Connor J. Clinical results of the Oxford knee: surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;205):21-42.
16. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. Long-term survivorship analysis of cruciate-sparing versus cruciate-sacrificing knee prostheses using meniscal bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;260):162-169.
17. Hungerford DS, Kenna RV, Krackow KA. The porous-coated anatomic total knee. Orthop Clin North Am 1982;13:103-122.
18. Ranawat CS, Sculco JP. In: Ranawat CS, editor. History of the development of total knee prosthesis at the hospital for special surgery. Total condylar knee arthroplasty: technique, results, and complications 1985;Berlin: Springer Verlag. 3-6.
19. Easley ME, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Bullek DD. Primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty for the arthritic valgus knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;380):58-64.
20. Laskin RS. Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:182-185.
21. Repicci JA, Eberle RW. Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc 1999;8:20-27.
22. Jung YB, Lee YS. Principles of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Korean Orthop Assoc 2004;39:108-114.
23. Charnley J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: theory and practice 1979;New York: Springer-Verlag.
24. Barton JR. On the treatment of anchylosis, by the formation of artificial joints. North Am Med Surg J 1827;3:279-292.
25. Ollier L, Roy FE, Hebert OA. Traite experimental et Clinique de la regeneration des os et de la production artificielle du tissue osseux 1867;Vol 2:Paris: Masson et Fils.
26. Baer WS. Arthroplasty with the aid of animal membrane. Am J Orthop Surg 1918;16:1-29. 94-115. 171-199.
27. Campbell WC. Arthroplasty of the hip: an analysis of 48 cases. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1926;43:9-17.
28. Oh I, Carlson CE, Tomford WW, Harris WH. Improved fixation of the femoral component after total hip replacement using a methacrylate intramedullary plug. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:608-613.
29. Sayre LA. A new operation for artificial hip joint in bony anchylosis: illustrated by two cases. Trans Med Soc N Y 1863;111-127.
30. Kallio KE. Skin arthroplasty of the hip joint. Acta Orthop Scand 1957;26:327-328.
31. Speed JS, Smith H. Campbell's operative orthopedics 1949;2nd ed. London: Kimpton.
32. Steel HH. Triple osteotomy of the innominate bone: a procedure to accomplish coverage of the dislocated or subluxa-ted femoral head in the older patient. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977;122):116-127.
33. Smith-Petersen MN. Evolution of mould arthroplasty of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1948;30B:59-75.
34. Aufranc OE. Constructive hip surgery with the vitallium mold; a report on 1,000 cases of arthroplasty of the hip over a fifteen-year period. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1957;39-A:237-248.
35. Moore AT, Bohlman HR. Metal hip joint: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1943;25:688-692.
36. Moore AT. The self-locking metal hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1957;39:811-827.
37. Gluck T. Die Invaginationsmethode der Osteo- und Arthroplastik. Berl Klin Wochenschr 1890;28:732-736. 752-757.
38. Wiles P. The surgery of the osteoarthritic hip. Br J Surg 1958;45:488-497.
39. Muller ME, Boltzy X. Artificial hip joints made from Protosol. Bull Assoc Study Probl Intern Fixat 1968;1-5.
40. Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE. The adult hip 2007;2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
41. Miller J. Pressure penetration of low viscosity acrylic cement for improved fixation of arthroplasty components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982;64:619.
42. Harris WH, McCarthy JC Jr, O'Neill DA. Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:1063-1067.
43. Eftekhar NS, Demarest RJ. Total hip arthroplasty 1993;St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc..
- TOOLS
-
- Share :
-
-
METRICS
-
Related articles in
J Korean Med Assoc -
Current state of total knee arthroplasty2020 August;63(8)
Total ankle arthroplasty2020 August;63(8)
Current concept of shoulder replacement arthroplasty2020 August;63(8)
The Policy of NIP and VPD Control2004 June;47(6)
The preconception stress and mental health of couples2011 August;54(8)
- Editorial Office
-
37 Ichon-ro 46-gil, Yongsan-gu, Seoul
Tel: +82-2-6350-6562 Fax: +82-2-792-5208 E-mail: jkmamaster@gmail.com
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Medical Association.
