References
1. Wen H, Denison TJ, Singerman RW, Balaban RS. The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in human cardiac imaging at 1.5, 3, and 4T. J Magn Reson 1997. 12565–71.
2. Wiesinger F, Boesiger P, Pruessmann KP. Electrodynamics and ultimate SNR in parallel MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004. 52376–390.
3. Bammer R, Schoenberg SO. Current concepts and advances in clinical parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004. 15129–158.
4. Hays AG, Schär M, Kelle S. Clinical applications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 3 tesla. Curr Cardiol Rev 2009. 5237–242.
5. Lohan DG, Saleh R, Tomasian A, Krishnam M, Finn JP. Current status of 3-T cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2008. 193–13.
6. Tyler DJ, Hudsmith LE, Petersen SE, Francis JM, Weale P, Neubauer S, Clarke K, Robson MD. Cardiac cine MR-imaging at 3T: FLASH vs SSFP. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006. 8709–715.
7. Deshpande VS, Shea SM, Li D. Artifact reduction in true-FISP imaging of the coronary arteries by adjusting imaging frequency. Magn Reson Med 2003. 49803–809.
8. Wieben O, Francois C, Reeder SB. Cardiac MRI of ischemic heart disease at 3 T: potential and challenges. Eur J Radiol 2008. 6515–28.
9. Nael K, Fenchel M, Saleh R, Finn JP. Cardiac MR imaging: new advances and role of 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007. 15291–300.
10. Fenchel M, Kramer U, Nael K, Miller S. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2007. 1895–104.
11. Cheng AS, Pegg TJ, Karamitsos TD, Searle N, Jerosch-Herold M, Choudhury RP, Banning AP, Neubauer S, Robson MD, Selvanayagam JB. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5-tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007. 492440–2449.
12. Zerhouni EA, Parish DM, Rogers WJ, Yang A, Shapiro EP. Human heart: tagging with MR imaging: a method for noninvasive assessment of myocardial motion. Radiology 1988. 16959–63.
13. Fischer SE, McKinnon GC, Maier SE, Boesiger P. Improved myocardial tagging contrast. Magn Reson Med 1993. 30191–200.
14. Kramer U, Deshpande V, Fenchel M, Klumpp B, Laub G, Finn JP, Claussen CD, Miller S. Cardiac MR tagging: optimization of sequence parameters and comparison at 1.5 T and 3.0 T in a volunteer study. Rofo 2006. 178515–524.
15. Yang Q, Li K, Liu X, Bi X, Liu Z, An J, Zhang A, Jerecic R, Li D. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0-T: a comparative study with X-ray angiography in a single center. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009. 5469–76.
16. Sommer T, Hackenbroch M, Hofer U, Schmiedel A, Willinek WA, Flacke S, Gieseke J, Träber F, Fimmers R, Litt H, Schild H. Coronary MR angiography at 3.0 T versus that at 1.5 T: initial results in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. Radiology 2005. 234718–725.
17. Maintz D, Ozgun M, Hoffmeier A, Quante M, Fischbach R, Manning WJ, Heindel W, Botnar RM. Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: value for the detection of coronary artery stenoses in comparison to multislice computed tomography angiography. Acta Radiol 2007. 48967–973.
18. Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Kefer J, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. Direct comparison of whole-heart navigator-gated magnetic resonance coronary angiography and 40-and 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography to detect the coronary artery stenosis in patients scheduled for conventional coronary angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2008. 1114–121.