The Method of Impairment Evaluation

Article information

J Korean Med Assoc. 2009;52(6):552-557
Publication date (electronic) : 2009 June 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2009.52.6.552
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Korea. ygchung@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract

An impairment is defined as "a loss, loss of use, or derangement of any body part, organ system or organ function". The impairment evaluation should be performed by physicians. To determine permanent impairment associated with medical condition a standard method should be used. It is a general principle that an evaluation of permanent impairment only be performed when the physician considers the person to have reached a state of maximum medical improvement. Maximum medical improvement is considered when the person's condition has been medically stable and is unlikely to change by more than 3% of whole body impairment within the next 12 months. The physician must use the entire clinical skill and judgment to perform the proper impairment evaluation. A report of the evaluation of permanent impairment should be accurate, comprehensive and fair. The physicians are reminded that they have a duty to act in an ethical, professional and considerate manner when examining the person for the purpose of assessing the permanent impairment.

References

1. Kim CH. A study on the reform of the physical disability evaluation system. Indep Med Exam 2007. 435–43.
2. Lee KS. Independent medical examination, concepts and needs. Indep Med Exam 2005. 21–4.
3. Mooney V. Impairment, disability, and handicap. Clin Orthop 1987. 22114–25.
4. Lim KS. The fundamental of compensation medicine 2000. 4th edth ed. Seoul: Jungangmoonhwa; 40–119.
5. McBride ED. Disability evaluation and principles of treatment of compensable injuries 1963. 6th edth ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 68–103.
6. American Medical Association. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment 2005. 5th edth ed. Chicago: AMA press; 17–24.
7. Lee KS. Impairment evaluation and independent medical examination 2002. 1st Edth ed. Seoul: Jungangmoonhwa; 34–67.
8. Korean Orthopaedic Association. Disability evaluation 2005. 1st Edth ed. Seoul: Seoul Med-Media; 13–27.
9. Lee KS. Medical considerations in reparation and compensation 1992. 1st Edth ed. Seoul: Jinsoo Publishing; 16–23.
10. Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs. The Disability Act, Enforcement Rule, An annexed list 1 2003.
11. Lee SD. How to write medical document. Indep Med Exam 2005. 217–21.
12. Ko Y. The role of Korean Academy of Independent Medical Examiners-disability evaluation. Indep Med Exam 2004. 14–7.
13. Lee KS. Impairment evaluation and independent medical examination 2002. 1st Edth ed. Seoul: Jungangmoonhwa; 67–86.
14. Lee KS. Medical considerations in reparation and compensation 1992. 1st Edth ed. Seoul: Jinsoo Publishing; 122–132.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

The relationship between impairment, disability, and handicap.