Definition and Diagnosis of the Metabolic Syndrome

Article information

J Korean Med Assoc. 2005;48(12):1157-1164
Publication date (electronic) : 2005 December 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2005.48.12.1157
1Department of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Korea. sj830@samsung.com
2Department of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Korea. mklee@smc.samsung.co.kr

Abstract

The metabolic syndrome has become one of the major public-health challenges worldwide. The ultimate importance of metabolic syndrome is that it helps identify individuals at high risk for both type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Several expert groups have attempted to propose diagnostic criteria for the metabolic syndrome. The most widely accepted of these have been proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance (EGIR), National Cholesterol Education Program- Third Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP III), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), and recently American Heart Association-National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (AHA/NHLBI). All groups agree on the critical components of the metabolic syndrome: obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and hypertension. However, the existence of multiple definitions for the metabolic syndrome has caused confusion and has also proved difficult to make direct comparisons between the studies where different definitions were used to identify the syndrome or the data from different countries. Therefore, International Diabetes Federation (IDF) developed a new practical definition that would be useful in any country or study for the identification of people at high risk of CVD and diabetes. The metabolic syndrome requires much more studies before its definition is confirmed to acquire more accurate predictive power.

References

1. Reaven GM. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 1988. 371595–1607.
2. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1 : Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus, provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabetes Med 1998. 15539–553.
3. Balkau B, Charles MA. Comment on the provisional report from the WHO consultation. European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance (EGIR). Diabetes Med 1999. 16442–443.
4. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults(Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001. 2852486–2497.
5. ACE position statement: Guidelines for glycemic control. Guidelines for glycemic control. Endocr Pract 2003. 9Suppl 1. 7–19.
6. The IDF consensus worldwide definition of the metabolic syndrome. International Diabetes Federation 2005. 04. 14. http://www.idf.org/webdata/docs/Meta_syndrome_def.pdf.
7. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Costa F, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome. An American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation 2005. 112epubhttp://www.circulationaha.org/cgi/reprint/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.169404v1.pdf.
8. Lim S, Lee HK, Park KS, Cho SI. Changes in the characteristics of metabolic syndrome in Korea over the period 1998~2001 as determined by Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Diabetes Care 2005. 281810–1812.
9. Ford ES. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome defined by the international diabetes federation among adults in the US. Diabetes Care 2005. 282745–2749.
10. Kahn R, Ferrannini E, Buse J, Stern M. The metabolic syndrome: Time for a critical appraisal. Joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005. 282289–2304.
11. Ford ES, Giles WH. A comparison of the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome using two proposed definitions. Diabetes Care 2003. 26575–581.
12. Meigs JB, Wilson PW, Nathan DM, D'Agostino RB Sr, Williams K, Haffner SM. Prevalence and characteristics of the metabolic syndrome in the San Antonio Heart and Framingham Offspring Studies. Diabetes 2003. 522160–2167.
13. McLaughlin T, Abbasi F, Cheal K, Chu J, Lamendola C, Reaven G. Use of metabolic markers to identify overweight individuals who are insulin-resistant. Ann Intern Med 2003. 139802–809.
14. Lempiainen P, Mykkanen L, Pyorala K, Laakso M, Kuusisto J. Insulin resistance syndrome predicts coronary heart disease events in elderly non-diabetic men. Circulation 1999. 100123–128.
15. Kekalainen P, Sarlund H, Pyorala K, Laakso M. Hyperinsulinemia cluster predicts the development of type 2 diabetes independent of a family history of diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999. 2286–92.
16. Pyorala M, Miettinen H, Halonen P, Laakso M, Pyorala K. Insulin resistance syndrome predicts the risk of coronary heart disease and stroke in healthy middle-aged men: the 22-year follow-up results of the Helsinki Policemen Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000. 20538–544.
17. Kuusisto J, Lempiainen P, Mykkanen L, Laakso M. Insulin resistance syndrome predicts coronary heart disease events in elderly type 2 diabetic men. Diabetes Care 2001. 241629–1633.
18. Onta A, Ceyhan K, Basar O, Erer B, Tobrak S, Sansoy V. Metabolic syndrome: major impact on coronary risk in a population with low cholesterol levels: a prospective and cross-sectional evaluation. Atherosclerosis 2002. 165285–292.
19. Scuteri A, Najjar S, Morrell C, Lakatta E. The metabolic syndrome in older individuals: prevalence and prediction of cardiovascular events. Diabetes Care 2005. 28882–887.
20. Stern MP, Williams K, Gonzalez-Villalpando C, Hunt KJ, Haffner SM. Dose the metabolic syndrome improve identification of individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease? Diabetes Care 2004. 272676–2681.
21. Malik S, Wong ND, Franklin SS, Kamath TV, L'Italien GJ, Wiliams GR, et al. Impact of the metabolic syndrome on mortality from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease and on all causes in United States adults. Circulation 2004. 1101245–1250.
22. Hunt KJ, Resendez RG, Wiliams K, Haffner SM, Stern MP. National Cholesterol Education Program versus World Health Organization metabolic syndrome in relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the San Antonio Heart Study. Circulation 2004. 1101251–1257.

Article information Continued

Table 1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 2

Table 3

Table 3

Table 4

Table 4

Table 5

Table 5

Table 6

Table 6

Table 7

Table 7