Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

Article information

J Korean Med Assoc. 2005;48(1):9-14
Publication date (electronic) : 2005 February 17
doi : https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2005.48.1.9
In Soon Kwon, M.D.
Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University School of Medicine, Seoul Paik Hospital, Korea. insoonkwon@hanmail.net

Abstract

Comprehensive geriatric assessment(CGA) is a multidimensional diagnostic process to determine the needs for care, to establish a plan for management, and to improve outcomes in frail elderly individuals. It frequently employs interdisciplinary team-approach and quantitative assessment tools, emphasizing the functional status and quality of life. The process of geriatric assessment is a systematic evaluation of physical health and functional status, continence, nutritional status, cognitive and psychological status, and socio-environmental factors. Most geriatric assessment studies result in a decrease in dependency and mortality, shorter hospital stays and fewer admissions to nursing homes, and cost-effective care. The program for inpatient units and the home CGA teams had more benefits than others. To settle down Geriatrics in Korea, we should pay more attention to the field of geriatric assessment research and development of the tools for the Korean elderly population.

Keywords: Geriatric assessment; Function; Quality of life

References

1. Rubenstein LZ. Joseph T. Freeman award lecture: comprehensive geriatric assessment: from miracle to reality. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2004. 59473–477.
2. Rubenstein LZ, Rubenstein LV. In : Tallis RC, Fillit HM, eds. Chapter 26 Multidimensional geriatric assessment. Brocklehurst's Textbook of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology 2003. 6th edth ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 291–299.
3. Gold S, Bergman H. Comprehensive geriatric assessment revisited...again. Age Ageing 2000. 29387–388.
4. Wells JL, Seabrook JA, Stolee P, Borrie MJ, Knoefel F. Review Article. State of the art in geriatric rehabilitation. Part I: Review of frailty and comprehensive geriatric assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003. 84890–897.
5. Newbury J, Byles J. In : Ratnaike RN, ed. chapter 4 functional assessment: 75+ health assessment in Australia. Practical guide to geriatric medicine 2002. New York: McGraw-Hill; 34–52.
6. Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Cavazzini C, Bandinelli S, Lauretani F, Longo DL, et al. The frailty syndrome: a critical issue in geriatric oncology. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2003. 46127–137.
7. Siu AL, Reuben DB, Moore AA. In : Hazzard WR, ed. Comprehensive geriatric assessment. Principles of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology 1994. 3rd edth ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 203–212.
9. Kane RA. In : Tallis RC, Fillit HM, eds. Social assessment of geriatric patients. Brocklehurst's Textbook of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology 2003. 6th edth ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 311–318.
10. Williams TF, Hill JH, Fairbank ME, Knox KG. Appropriate placement of the chronically ill and aged. a successful approach by evaluation. JAMA 1973. 2661332–1335.
11. Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR, Wieland GD, English PA, Sayre JA, Kane RL. Effectiveness of a geriatric evaluation unit: a randomized clinical trial. N Engl J Med 1984. 3111664–1670.
12. Schmader KE, Hanlon JT, Pieper CF, Sloane R, Ruby CM, Cohen HJ, et al. Effects of geriatric evaluation and management on adverse drug reactions and suboptimal prescribing in the frail elderly. Am J Med 2004. 116394–401.

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2005 Korean Medical Association

Figure 1

Figure 1