1. Report on certain enteric fever inoculation statistics. Br Med J 1904;2:1243-1246.
2. Glass GV. Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res 1976;5:3-8.
3. Mulrow CD. The medical review article: state of the science. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:485-488.
4. Cochrane AL. Effectiveness and efficiency: random reflec-tions on health services. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 1999.
5. Cochrane AL. 1931-1971: a critical review, with particular reference to the medical profession. In: Teeling-Smith G, Wells NE; Office of Health Economics. Medicines for the year 2000. London: Office of Health Economics; 1979. p. 1-11.
6. Bero L, Rennie D. The Cochrane Collaboration. Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. JAMA 1995;274:1935-1938.
7. Heejeng Son. Assessing methodology quality of Korean systematic review using AMSTAR. Seoul: Korea university; 2012.
8. McAlister FA, Clark HD, van Walraven C, Straus SE, Law-son FM, Moher D, Mulrow CD. The medical review article revisit-ed: has the science improved?. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:947-951.
9. Bravata DM, Olkin I. Simple pooling versus combining in meta-analysis. Eval Health Prof 2001;24:218-230.
10. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J 2009;26:91-108.
11. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA; Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343:d5928.
12. Petitti DB. Meta-analysis, decision analysis, and cost-effec-tiveness analysis: methods for quantitative synthesis in medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.
13. Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, Sheldon TA, Song F. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. 1st ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2000.
14. Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books; 2001.
15. Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz G. Systematic reviews in health care: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
16. Stangl DK, Berry DA. Meta-analysis in medicine and health policy. Basel: Marcel Dekker; 2000.
17. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-560.
18. Colditz GA, Brewer TF, Berkey CS, Wilson ME, Burdick E, Fineberg HV, Mosteller F. Efficacy of BCG vaccine in the prevention of tuberculosis. Meta-analysis of the published literature. JAMA 1994;271:698-702.
19. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA 1990;263:1385-1389.
20. Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influ-ence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med 2008;358:252-260.
21. Yusuf S, Teo K, Woods K. Intravenous magnesium in acute myocardial infarction. An effective, safe, simple, and inexpen-sive intervention. Circulation 1993;87:2043-2046.
22. ISIS-4: a randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58,050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Lancet 1995;345:669-685.
23. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:264-269.
24. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care inter-ventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000100.
25. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, Carpenter J, Rucker G, Harbord RM, Schmid CH, Tetzlaff J, Deeks JJ, Peters J, Macaskill P, Schwarzer G, Duval S, Altman DG, Moher D, Higgins JP. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011;343:d4002.
26. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter AC, Tugwell P, Moher D, Bouter LM. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:10.