Successful use of customer relationship management system in hospital healthcare centers

Article information

J Korean Med Assoc. 2012;55(8):748-756
Publication date (electronic) : 2012 August 16
doi : https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.8.748
1Graduate School of Healthcare Management & Policy, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
2Department of Business Administration, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Corresponding author: Inyoung Choi, iychoi@catholic.ac.kr
Received 2012 June 29; Accepted 2012 June 12.

Abstract

Customer relationship management (CRM) is a valuable method for establishing long-term customer relationships across different business areas. CRM system stores and analyzes a vast amount of customer information and provides alternatives to meet customer expectations using data warehouse and on-line analysis processing technology. Intensified competitiveness in the healthcare industry has increased the number of healthcare centers and propelled the introduction of CRM systems to meet diverse customer satisfaction. Leading the adoption of information technology in the healthcare businesses has enabled the use of CRM technology to develop close patient-provider relationship. Especially, healthcare centers are using CRM system to provide better healthcare services as well as customer management services. This study aims to explore the current status and influential factors that will stimulate and drive the successful use of CRM system in healthcare centers. For this purpose, a survey has been conducted for CRM system users in 13 healthcare centers to investigate the current status of CRM system and the influential factors for successful use. The evaluation criteria include four categories; system quality, information quality, service quality and perceived usefulness. These criteria have been developed based on previous researches, especially DeLone & McLean information system success model. In addition, the system output is evaluated by user satisfaction, personal performance and organizational performance. The study showed that users evaluated information quality and service quality positively and to be higher than other factors in terms of influence. And the user evaluation proved that CRM system provides increased user satisfaction, organizational performance, and especially, individual performance. This is clear evidence that CRM system will improve organizational efficiency and effectiveness, which in turn, can provide competitive advantage for the healthcare centers.

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (A112022).

References

1. Trepper C. CRM: customer care goes end-to-end. Information Week 2000. 05. 15.
2. Ngai EW. Customer relationship management research (1992-2002): an academic literature review and classification. Mark Intell Plan 2005. 23582–605.
3. Bauer HH, Grether M, Leach M. Building customer relations over the internet. Ind Mark Manag 2002. 31155–163.
4. Reichheld FF, Sasser WE Jr. Zero defections: quality comes to services. Harv Bus Rev 1990. 68105–111.
5. Almunawar MN, Anshari M. Improving customer service in healthcare with CRM 2.0 [Internet] 2012. cited 2012 Jul 23. [place unknown]: arXiv; Available from: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3685.pdf.
6. Arora NK. Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior. Soc Sci Med 2003. 57791–806.
7. Beak HS. Research and study on performance analysis of hospital CRM system and its improvement [dissertation] 2007. Seoul: Yonsei University;
8. Hung SY, Hung WH, Tsai CA, Jiang SC. Critical factors of hospital adoption on CRM system: organizational and information system perspectives. Decis Support Syst 2010. 48592–603.
9. Cho DY, Kim YJ. The study on characteristics of university medical center user. J Ind Econ Bus 2009. 222399–2420.
10. Korean Hospital Association. Medical institution and location information [Internet] c2009. cited 2012 Jul 18. Seoul: Korean Hospital Association; Available from: http://www.hospitalmaps.or.kr/hm/frHospital/hospital_list_emergency.jsp?&s_mid=020200.
11. Park SH. A study on effectiveness of CRM (customer relationship management) for efficiency hospital management: focusing on the CRM application in hospital healthcare center [dissertation] 2006. Seoul: The University of Seoul;
12. Kim YC. An empirical study on success factors of CRM: with the emphasis on analytical CRM system [dissertation] 2001. Seoul: Yonsei University;
13. Kwon JS. A study on customer relationship management in general hospital [dissertation] 2009. Jinju: Gyeongsang National University;
14. Chun JR. The factors and weight analysis for the performance measurement of hospital CRM system [dissertation] 2006. Cheongju: Cheongju University;
15. Park CW. Factors influencing on the database marketing implementation: a study of Korean banks. Korean J Mark 1999. 1445–69.
16. Lee SH. A study of hospital CRM construction: based on more than 500 beds [dissertation] 2005. Seoul: Konkuk University;
17. Wang KH. Survey on hospital information systems and their influencing factors in Korea [dissertation] 2006. Seoul: Yonsei University;
18. Chung HT. Effect of medical CRM system operation on management improvement and customer satisfaction in the hospital [dissertation] 2005. Seoul: Hanyang University;
19. Choi JH. Study on the success factors and failure factors for CRM adoption [dissertation] 2002. Deagu: Keimyung University;
20. Kim YT. A study on CRM adoption of medical institutions. Gohwangnonjib 2007. 40167–184.
21. Jo JH, Park JS, Shin SW. A study on remodeling of health examination center to health promotion center: focused on proper function and size of common space. Korea Ins Healthc Archit J 2007. 1315–24.
22. Lee YH. Health diagnostic center users' attitudes and satisfaction for a comprehensive health examination [dissertation] 1998. Daegu: Kyunhpook National University;
23. Lee SH, Jung JI, Lee JR. An empirical study on customer satisfaction of health examination center. J Glob Acad Mark Sci 2000. 6211–231.
24. Kim NR. Analysis of the factors influencing the medical reexamination in the center of health promotion [dissertation] 2008. Seoul: Yonsei University;
25. DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res 1992. 360–95.
26. DeLone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information system success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst 2003. 199–30.
27. Pitt LF, Watson RT, Kavan CB. Service quality: a measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Q 1995. 19173–187.
28. Seddon PB. A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inf Syst Res 1997. 8240–253.
29. Myers BL, Kappelman LA, Prybutok VR. A comprehensive model for assessing the quality and productivity of the information systems function: toward a theory for information systems assessment. Inf Resour Manag J 1997. 106–25.
30. Seddon PB, Kiew MY. A partial test and development of the DeLoneand McLean model of IS success. Australas J Inf Syst 1996. 490–109.
31. Rainer RK, Watson HJ. The keys to executive information system success. J Manag Inf Syst 1995. 1283–98.
32. Jung SK. The structural relationship study of information system quality influence on user satisfaction, individual, and organizational impacts: focus on partnership quality in the tourism industry [dissertation] 2009. Seoul: Kyung Hee University;

Article information Continued

Figure 1

System architecture and service flow of customer relationship management.

CRM, customer relationship management; EMR, electronic medical record; OCS, order communication system; MIS, management information system; DB, database; CDW, clinical data warehouse.

Table 1

Operational definition of variable

Table 1

Table 2

Characteristic of healthcare center

Table 2

Table 3

Function of customer relationship management systems

Table 3

*Multiple response.

Table 4

Success factors of customer relationship management system

Table 4

N=243

Table 5

Performance of customer relationship management system

Table 5