Future directions of chronic disease management in South Korea

Article information

J Korean Med Assoc. 2012;55(5):414-416
Publication date (electronic) : 2012 May 16
doi : https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.5.414
Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Corresponding author: Seok-Jun Yoon, yoonsj02@korea.ac.kr
Received 2012 March 28; Accepted 2012 April 11.

Abstract

In Korea, the proportion of medical costs due to chronic diseases among total health care expenditures is increasing rapidly. This trend calls for immediate countermeasures. In the major developed countries in Europe, a gatekeeper system has been adopted at the national level as a universal policy to manage and prevent chronic disease. In South Korea, insurers and local governments offer management programs to individuals with chronic disease and metabolic syndrome under the Korean government's Health Plan 2020, but these programs are fragmented and there are some related limitations. The role of the national government is very important to overcome this problem because the chronic disease management systems of other players (insurers, local governments) must be integrated. In addition, the expert patients program, which is intended to improve the self-care skills of chronic disease patients, needs to be better promoted. Incentives should include "mileage programs" in which patients can accumulate points for successful self-care. It is also important to increase public awareness through large-scale promotional campaigns. Finally, it is necessary to raise funds to conduct national-level campaigns and provide incentives to patients, and to ensure that all processes establish an organic cooperation system. Such practices will maximize the positive effects of a nationwide chronic disease management system in South Korea.

References

1. Oh IH, Yoon SJ, Kim EJ. The burden of disease in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 2011. 54646–652.
2. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Health care systems: efficiency and policy settings 2010. Paris: OECD Publishing;

Article information Continued