Current status of medical radiation exposure and regulation efforts
Article information
J Korean Med Assoc. 2011;54(12):1248-1252
Publication date (electronic) : 2011 December 13
doi :
https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2011.54.12.1248
Received 2011 November 10; Accepted 2011 November 20.
Abstract
The radiation exposure from diagnostic medical imaging has increased. The potential risk from radiation exposure of the patient also has increased even though the risk from a small amount of radiation exposure has not been clearly demonstrated. Any medical radiation exposure must be justified and the examinations which use ionizing radiation must be optimized. The education of the referring physician and radiologist are important. However, stronger regulation is essential to control medical radiation exposure. Many national and international organizations have made a significant effort to regulate and monitor medical radiation exposure using guidelines, accreditation, or even laws. Medical radiation exposure must be controlled, and this could be achieved by continuous interest from health professionals and organizations.
Acknowledgement
Supported by grant no 04-2011-0290 from the SNUH Research Fund.
References
1. Kopp AF, Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Georg C, Schroder S, Kuttner A, Martensen J, Claussen CD. Cardiac multidetector-row CT: first clinical results of retrospectively ECG-gated spiral with optimized temporal and spatial resolution. Rofo 2000. 172429–435.
2. Rubins JB. The current approach to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: lessons from PIOPED II. Postgrad Med 2008. 1201–7.
3. Stein PD, Woodard PK, Weg JG, Wakefield TW, Tapson VF, Sostman HD, Sos TA, Quinn DA, Leeper KV Jr, Hull RD, Hales CA, Gottschalk A, Goodman LR, Fowler SE, Buckley JD. PIOPED II Investigators. Diagnostic pathways in acute pulmonary embolism: recommendations of the PIOPED II Investigators. Radiology 2007. 24215–21.
4. Valentin J. International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection 2007. Amsterdam: Elsevier;
5. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States: NCRP report no. 160 2006. Bethesda: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements;
6. Source and effects of ionizing radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation [Internet]. United Nations 2010. cited 2011 Dec 5. New York: United Nations; Available from: http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2008/09-86753_Report_2008_Annex_A.pdf.
7. Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP. Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 2004. 231393–398.
8. O'Sullivan J, O'Connor OJ, O'Regan K, Clarke B, Burgoyne LN, Ryan MF, Maher MM. An assessment of medical students' awareness of radiation exposures associated with diagnostic imaging investigations. Insights Imaging 2010. 186–92.
9. Borgen L, Stranden E, Espeland A. Clinicians' justification of imaging: do radiation issues play a role? Insight Imaging 2010. 1193–200.
10. Krille L, Hammer GP, Merzenich H, Zeeb H. Systematic review on physician's knowledge about radiation doses and radiation risks of computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 2010. 7636–41.
11. ACR appropriateness criteria [Internet] cited 2011 Nov 18. Reston: American College of Radiology; Available from: http://www.acr.org/ac.
12. Guidelines on education and training in radiation protection for medical exposures: radiation protection 116 [Internet] 2000. cited 2011 Nov 18. Brussels: European Commission; Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radiation_protection/doc/publication/116.pdf.
13. Draft euratom basic safety standards directive [Internet] 2010. cited 2011 Nov 18. Brussels: European Commission; Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radiation_protection/doc/art31/2010_02_24_draft_euratom_basic_safety_standards_directive.pdf.
14. International action plan for the radiation protection of patients [Internet] cited 2011 Nov 18. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; Available from:http://rpop.iaea.org/RPOP/RPoP/Content/ArchivedNews/ReportSteeringPanel.htm.
15. California S.B. 1237: radiation dosage 2010. 06. 23.
16. Radiation protection in diagnostic and interventional radiology [Internet] 2008. cited 2011 Nov 18. Melbourne: Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency; Available from: http://www.arpansa.gov.au/pubs/rps/rps14_1.pdf.
17. Inside Radiology [Internet] cited 2011 Nov 18. Sydney: Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists; Available from: http://www.insideradiology.com.au/.
Article information Continued
Copyright © 2011 Korean Medical Association