Modern-day medical professionalism: historical background, evolution of the concepts, and a critique on the statements
Article information
J Korean Med Assoc. 2011;54(11):1124-1136
Publication date (electronic) : 2011 November 15
doi :
https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2011.54.11.1124
Received 2011 September 03; Accepted 2011 September 17.
Abstract
Modern day medical professionalism has been advocated by multiple professional organizations and individual scholars. Most of the statements publicly issued emphasize particular moral traditions and the highest professional standards along with doctors' social role to recover society's trust, which have proved ineffective in bringing any change. Based on the perspective that medical professionalism is a norm of practice, acknowledged and shared by the majority of current ordinary doctors, the author traced the emergence of modern professionalism to challenge the legitimacy of those virtue-based arguments within a historical context. With the increasing complexities of both society and the health care system, new types of health clinics have been practiced especially by young generation doctors. As these are explored, several factors related with those stated professionalism that are creating conflicts are discussed. It is criticized that those statements demand individual doctors to adhere to the ideal professionalism regardless of any circumstances, so that it excludes any discussion about professionalism from the broader social contextual background. Given that professionalism is a context-dependent concept, it is stressed that modern day medical professionalism is required to evolve along with societal change. As medicine is recognized as a system in which numerous societal areas are involved, medical professionalism is expected to be rewritten into a consensus-based, more realistic and explicit compact.
References
1. Sigerist H. Civilization and disease 1915. Ithaca: Cornell University Press;
2. Abraham F. Kim S. Medical education in the United States and Canada: a report to the Carnegie Foundation for the advancement of teaching 2005. Paju: Hangilsa;
3. Edelstein L. The Hippocratic oath, text, translation and interpretation 1943. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press;
4. Jonsen AR. A short history of medical ethics 2000. New York: Oxford University Press;
5. Wynia MK. The short history and tenuous future of medical professionalism: the erosion of medicine's social contract
. Perspect Biol Med 2008. 51565–578.
6. Baker R, Caplan A, Emanuel L, Latham S. The American medical ethics revolution: how the AMA's code of ethics has transformed physicians' relationships to patients, professionals, and society 1999. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press;
7. Paul S. Lee JC. The social transformation of American medicine 1996. Seoul: Myeonggyeong;
8. Fox RC. Cho HI. The sociology of medicine: a participant observer's view 1989. Seoul: Nanam;
9. Evetts J. The sociological analysis of professionalism: occupational change in the modern world. Int Sociol 2003. 18395–415.
10. Relman AS. The new medical-industrial complex. N Engl J Med 1980. 303963–970.
11. Kassirer JP. Choi BM. On the take: how medicine's complicity with big business can endanger your health 2008. Seoul: Yangmun;
12. Lundberg GD. Medicine: a profession in trouble? JAMA 1985. 2532879–2880.
13. Hafferty FW, Levinson D. Moving beyond nostalgia and motives: towards a complexity science view of medical professionalism. Perspect Biol Med 2008. 51599–615.
14. Swick HM. Toward a normative definition of medical professionalism. Acad Med 2000. 75612–616.
15. ABIM Foundation. American Board of Internal Medicine. ACPASIM Foundation. American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine. European Federation of Internal Medicine. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med 2002. 136243–246.
16. ACS Task Force on Professionalism. Code of professional conduct. J Am Coll Surg 2003. 197603–604.
17. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics. Fallat ME, Glover J. Professionalism in pediatrics: statement of principles. Pediatrics 2007. 120895–897.
18. Kearney RA. Defining professionalism in anaesthesiology. Med Educ 2005. 39769–776.
19. Rowley BD, Baldwin DC Jr, Bay RC, Karpman RR. Professionalism and professional values in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000. (378)90–96.
20. Woodruff JN, Angelos P, Valaitis S. Medical professionalism: one size fits all? Perspect Biol Med 2008. 51525–534.
21. Chung CW. Current situation of medical professionalism education in Korean medical schools. Korean J Med Educ 2004. 16259–267.
22. Shah N, Anderson J, Humphrey HJ. Teaching professionalism: a tale of three schools. Perspect Biol Med 2008. 51535–546.
23. Hilton S. Education and the changing face of medical professionalism: from priest to mountain guide? Br J Gen Pract 2008. 58353–361.
24. Cohen JJ. Professionalism in medical education, an American perspective: from evidence to accountability. Med Educ 2006. 40607–617.
25. Brennan TA, Rothman DJ, Blank L, Blumenthal D, Chimonas SC, Cohen JJ, Goldman J, Kassirer JP, Kimball H, Naughton J, Smelser N. Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest: a policy proposal for academic medical centers. JAMA 2006. 295429–433.
26. Campbell EG, Weissman JS, Ehringhaus S, Rao SR, Moy B, Feibelmann S, Goold SD. Institutional academic industry relationships. JAMA 2007. 2981779–1786.
27. Rothman DJ. Academic medical centers and financial conflicts of interest. JAMA 2008. 299695–697.
28. Rothman DJ, McDonald WJ, Berkowitz CD, Chimonas SC, DeAngelis CD, Hale RW, Nissen SE, Osborn JE, Scully JH Jr, Thomson GE, Wofsy D. Professional medical associations and their relationships with industry: a proposal for controlling conflict of interest. JAMA 2009. 3011367–1372.
29. Cohen JJ, Cruess S, Davidson C. Alliance between society and medicine: the publics stake in medical professionalism. JAMA 2007. 298670–673.
30. Lawson WD. Professionalism: the golden years. J Prof Issues Eng Pract 2004. 13026–36.
31. Hafferty FW, Castellani B. The increasing complexities of professionalism. Acad Med 2010. 85288–301.
32. Brainard AH, Brislen HC. Viewpoint: learning professionalism. A view from the trenches. Acad Med 2007. 821010–1014.
33. Daniel M. Human, transhuman, posthuman: implications of evolution-by-design for human security. J Hum Secur 2008. 44–20.
34. Sullivan P. Putting your doctor, or a whole team of them, on retainer 2011. 04. 29. The New York Times; business section.
35. Bishop JP, Rees CE. Hero or has-been: is there a future for altruism in medical education? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2007. 12391–399.
36. Karatani K. Song TW. Ethics 21 2001. Seoul: Sahoepyeongnon;
37. Glannon W, Ross LF. Are doctors altruistic? J Med Ethics 2002. 2868–69.
38. The new doctors: guidance on foundation training [Internet]. General Medical Council 2009. cited 2011 Oct 14. London: General Medical Council; Available from: http://www.gmcuk.org/New_Doctor09_FINAL.pdf_27493417.pdf_39279971.pdf.
39. Jonsen AR. Lee IH, Kim YJ. The new medicine and the old ethics 2007. Suwon: Munhwa Design;
40. Shaw K, Cassel CK, Black C, Levinson W. Shared medical regulation in a time of increasing calls for accountability and transparency: comparison of recertification in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. JAMA 2009. 3022008–2014.
41. Chantler C, Ashton R. The purpose and limits to professional self-regulation. JAMA 2009. 3022032–2033.
42. Ham C, Alberti KG. The medical profession, the public, and the government. BMJ 2002. 324838–842.
43. Hafferty F.
. Acad Med 2006. 81906–914.
44. Kinghorn WA, McEvoy MD, Michel A, Balboni M. Professionalism in modern medicine: does the emperor have any clothes? Acad Med 2007. 8240–45.
45. Definition of health [Internet]. World Health Organization 2000. cited 2011 Oct 14. Geneva: World Health Organization; Available from: https://apps.who.int/aboutwho/en/definition.html.
46. Freidson E. Professionalism, the third logic 2001. Chicago: University of Chicago Press;
Article information Continued
Copyright © 2011 Korean Medical Association